Back to Journal

    What Your Team Does When You're Not Watching

    Leadership
    What Your Team Does When You're Not Watching

    A junior staff member spots a number that doesn't add up on an invoice. Nobody else has noticed. Fixing it properly means an awkward conversation with a senior colleague and a delay the client won't like. Letting it slide costs nothing, today, to anyone in the room.

    That's the actual test of a company's ethics. Not the framed poster in the break room. Not the policy document everyone signed in their first week and never opened again. It's that one small, unwitnessed decision, repeated thousands of times a week across an organisation, by people nobody is standing over.

    Most businesses already have a code of conduct. Far fewer have a culture that makes it true.

    A Code Is Compliance. Culture Is Behaviour.

    A well-written code of conduct does real work. It clarifies what an organisation actually stands for, sets a clear standard for how leaders and employees are expected to behave, and gives people something concrete to point to when they're navigating a genuinely hard call. For public companies, having one isn't optional. For everyone else, it should be.

    But a code sitting in a drawer changes nothing. The gap between the document and the daily decision is where most organisations actually lose their integrity. Not in some dramatic scandal, but in the steady accumulation of small moments where nobody was watching and the easier choice won.

    Why Silence Is the Default

    This isn't a hypothetical risk. A Gallup study of the US working population found that 24 per cent of employees had personally seen or become aware of unethical behaviour at work in the past 12 months. Of those who saw something, fewer than half actually reported it.

    Read that the other way around: in any given year, most people who witness a genuine ethical problem at work choose to say nothing. This rarely happens because people don't care. It happens because the system around them hasn't made it clear that speaking up is safe, expected, or likely to matter. That's not a training gap. It's a culture gap. It is the exact failure a code of conduct is supposed to prevent, but usually doesn't, because the document itself was never the problem.

    Ethics Is Not a Separate Category

    In There's No Such Thing as "Business" Ethics, John Maxwell makes the point directly: "there's no such thing as business ethics." There is only ethics. One standard, applied everywhere, by everyone, whether someone is watching or not.

    That's a harder standard than most codes of conduct actually ask for. It means the same person who would never lie to a friend cannot quietly let a misleading number pass because "that's just how the industry works." It means the standard you would want applied to you is the standard you apply when nobody's checking.

    Most ethical failures inside a business aren't committed by people who think of themselves as unethical. They're committed by reasonably decent people who've drawn a mental line between their personal standards and their professional ones, and who've never been asked, directly, to notice that the line exists.

    What Actually Closes the Gap

    A code of conduct only earns its place when it becomes the central reference point for everyday decisions, not just the document people sign once to protect the business. It sets the standard leaders are visibly held to, not only the standard employees are reminded of.

    We had to face this reality directly at CreateOne. We brought on a senior manager who happened to be a close personal friend of our CEO. During onboarding, he refused to participate in our standard behavioural profiling, a tool we use to ensure alignment and transparency across the team. Because of his personal relationship at the top, the rule was bent, and he wasn't required to do it.

    It seemed like a small, harmless exception at the time. But the gap between what we said we valued and what we actually tolerated had already been created. Over the next six months, that initial refusal manifested as a broader pattern of questionable financial and strategic choices. The shortcut at the start predicted the behaviour that followed. Ultimately, we made the difficult call to end his employment.

    It was an expensive, painful reminder: culture only works if raising a concern or enforcing a standard applies to everyone. Especially when it's uncomfortable. Especially when it involves the people at the top. None of this happens because a policy exists. It happens because leaders are seen living by it first, in the small, unglamorous moments nobody's tracking.

    The Only Question That Matters

    If your organisation's code of conduct disappeared tomorrow, deleted, gone, no copy anywhere, would daily decisions actually change? Or would people keep behaving exactly the way they already do, because the standard was never really coming from the document in the first place?

    That's the only question that matters. Everything else is paperwork.

    Key Takeaways

    • Audit yourself this week. Notice one small decision you made that nobody else would have known about either way. Ask yourself honestly whether you held the same standard you would want from someone else.
    • Test the psychological safety. Ask a junior team member, directly, whether they would feel safe raising a concern about someone more senior. Their answer will tell you more than any policy document.
    • Check the engagement. Find out how many people in your organisation have actually read your code of conduct in the last twelve months, rather than just signing it once during onboarding.
    • Draw the line. The next time you witness a small, unwitnessed shortcut, even a minor policy exemption for a colleague, decide deliberately whether to let it pass or address it. That decision is your actual culture, not the policy that sits behind it.
    Leadershipcultureethicsleadership